Fact-check my own draft against sources
Fact-check the draft below. Work claim by claim. Output a table: Claim (quoted) | Type (statistic / attribution / causa…
69 copies · 17 likesAn AI research assistant that uses language models to help you automate research workflows
Search & ResearchScreenshots have not been verified for this listing yet.
An AI research assistant that uses language models to help you automate research workflows. Use AI to search, summarize, extract data from, and chat with over 125 million papers. Used by over 2 million researchers in academia and industry. Elicit AI is an AI-powered research assistant that automates tasks like searching academic papers, summarizing findings, and extracting data for literature reviews. It targets researchers, academics, students, and professionals in fields like pharmaceuticals, policy, and tech, helping them handle over 138 million papers efficiently. I think it's especially handy for anyone new to a topic who wants quick evidence-based overviews. Unlike keyword-based tools like Google Scholar, Elicit uses semantic search powered by language models to understand your research question in natural language and find relevant papers even without exact matches. It pulls from databases like Semantic Scholar and clinical trials, often surfacing up to 1,000 results with sentence-level citations. Users on Reddit note it saves time but might miss some niche papers, so it's best as a starting point. Elicit automates screening, data extraction, and report generation for systematic reviews, claiming up to 80% time savings based on user reports and a 2025 medRxiv study. You can customize criteria and override AI decisions, making it reliable for evidence synthesis. That said, a BMC study from March 2025 found it identifies about 50% of key articles accurately, so verify outputs for rigor. Elicit achieves around 80-90% accuracy in extracting and summarizing data, per 2025 evaluations like one in AI Flow Review, with transparent citations to original sources. It's strong in empirical fields like biomedicine but less so for abstract topics. Reviewers suggest cross-checking, as occasional nuances get lost, but the tool's validation beats general AI like ChatGPT. Elicit allows sharing projects and libraries internally, and it integrates with Zotero for reference management, but lacks open APIs or deep third-party syncing as of late 2025. Team plans enable shared quotas for group reviews, though Reddit users say it's not fully collaborative like Google Docs. It works well for solo or small-team workflows. Elicit doesn't use uploaded PDFs or queries to train its models, keeping your research confidential, as confirmed in their privacy policy and 2025 reviews on Paperpal. It's above average for academic tools, with no reported breaches, but always review terms if handling sensitive data. I probably wouldn't hesitate for most projects.
No announcements yet.
Recent follows, shares, ratings, and collection saves for Elicit.
No community activity yet. Follow or share Elicit to get things started.
Community-tested prompts that work with this app.
Fact-check the draft below. Work claim by claim. Output a table: Claim (quoted) | Type (statistic / attribution / causa…
69 copies · 17 likesHelp me read this paper: {{paste or attach}}. My background: {{level}}. Why I'm reading it: {{purpose}}. 1. THE CLAIM —…
73 copies · 11 likesBuild me a reading path for {{topic}}, aimed at {{goal}}. My background: {{level}}. 1. Give 8-12 items in reading order…
52 copies · 8 likesWhat research question would be a good first test for Elicit?
Sign in to join the discussion.