Explain a statistical result to a non-technical exec

Here's the result: {{paste the numbers — effect size, confidence interval, p-value, sample size, whatever you have}}. Method: {{what you did}}. Audience: {{role}}, who will use it to decide {{decision}}.

Write the explanation in this order:
1. The one-sentence answer to their actual question, in their units — revenue, customers, hours — not in statistical language.
2. How confident we are, expressed as a range of real-world outcomes rather than as a p-value.
3. What would have to be true for this to be wrong, in plain terms.
4. What this result does not say — specifically the conclusion they're most likely to jump to.
5. The one thing that would meaningfully increase confidence, and what it would cost.

Ban these words entirely: significant, correlation, robust, directionally. If a sentence needs one of them, rewrite the sentence.

Then give me the single slide version: one number, one sentence, one caveat.