Landing page teardown against the message hierarchy

Tear down the landing page copy below for {{audience}}.

Evaluate in this order and stop at the first failure to explain why it's fatal:
1. In 5 seconds, can the visitor say what this is, who it's for, and what changes for them?
2. Does the hero make a claim a competitor could not honestly copy-paste?
3. Is the primary CTA a single next step with visible risk removed?
4. Does each section answer the objection the previous section created?
5. Is proof placed where doubt appears, or dumped in a logo bar?
6. Does anything ask for effort before showing value?

Output: a table of Section | What it says | What the visitor thinks | Fix. Then rewrite the hero three ways: outcome-led, problem-led, and mechanism-led. End with the single change you'd ship first and what metric should move.

PAGE COPY:
{{paste page copy}}