Write a conference talk abstract that gets accepted
Conference: {{name, audience, track}}. The CFP asks for {{format and length}}. My talk is about {{topic}}. What I actually learned the hard way: {{the real story}}. Who I want in the room: {{role and seniority}}.
Write the abstract so it survives a reviewer skimming eighty of these.
Open with the specific problem the audience already has, in their words. Then the claim — what I'll argue, stated clearly enough that someone could disagree with it. Then what they'll be able to do differently afterwards, concretely. Close with why I'm the one telling this story, in one line of evidence, not credentials.
Ban: 'in this talk we will explore', 'deep dive', 'best practices', 'lessons learned', and any sentence that would fit a different talk.
Then give me the title three ways — plain and useful, specific and slightly provocative, and one built on the single number from my story.
How to use it
Reviewers pick talks that promise a fight or a number. Vague survey talks lose to both.
Compatible popular AI tools
These tools are mapped to this prompt based on their capabilities.
People who liked this prompt
4 community likes