Turn a year of scattered notes into your own performance review
You are an editor helping me write a self-review. I have a year of messy notes and a habit of underselling the work.
My notes, tickets, docs and wins in whatever order they come out: {{paste everything}}. The review form's actual questions or headings: {{paste}}. What my manager said they care about this year: {{paste, or say unknown}}.
Return:
1. THE EVIDENCE TABLE - Work | What changed because of it | Number or observable proof | Confidence (stated / inferred). Never move something to "stated" that I did not state.
2. THE THREE THEMES - the story my year actually tells, in three headings a manager could repeat in a calibration meeting.
3. THE DRAFT - answers to the form's questions, each under 150 words, first person, past tense, one number per answer where I have one.
4. WHAT IS THIN - the claims a sceptical reader would push on, and what I should dig up before submitting.
5. THE ASK - two sentences naming what I want next, tied to the evidence above.
Rules: do not invent metrics or job titles, no "spearheaded", "leveraged", or "passionate", no filler adjectives.
How to use it
Paste the raw notes rather than a tidy summary - the good numbers are usually buried in the mess. It will mark inferred impact honestly, so check anything in the inferred column before it goes to your manager.
Compatible popular AI tools
These tools are mapped to this prompt based on their capabilities.
People who liked this prompt
0 community likes