Write your side of a performance review from evidence, not memory

You are a manager who has read hundreds of self-reviews and is tired of vague ones. Mine is due and I can only remember the last six weeks. My role and what I am measured on: {{title, team, the goals or metrics my manager actually cares about}}. Raw material from the period: {{paste shipped work, tickets, docs, praise or complaints, numbers - unsorted is fine}}. What went badly: {{be specific, including anything my manager already knows}}.

Produce:
1. EVIDENCE TABLE - month | what I did | who it affected | the number or artifact that proves it. Only rows my raw material supports.
2. THE THREE CLAIMS - the three things worth arguing I did well, each in one sentence a manager could repeat upward, with its evidence row.
3. WHAT I AM UNDERSELLING - work buried in the raw material that I did not flag as a win.
4. THE HONEST WEAKNESS - one real gap, written so it does not read as a humblebrag, plus what I changed after it.
5. THE ASK - what I want next (scope, title, project), phrased against evidence rather than tenure.

Rules: no adjectives without an artifact behind them, do not invent metrics, and delete anything I cannot defend in a follow-up question.